The
AOR AR7030 is a very good receiver in my book.
It has seen it's share of quality problems over the years,
more with the parts used and soft metal cabinet.
(AOR
UK photo)
Also
see : AOR
AR7030 HF Tabletop Receiver User Notes page
Discontinued Receiver
For those who are not aware what the AR7030 even is, go to the AOR UK Web site . Unlike other AOR receivers
that are made in Japan, this one is designed and made in the
United Kingdom.
The "Plus" version/ "Standard" version /
Tuning Knob Encoder Issues
Two versions of this receiver still being being sold. The "Standard"
Unit and after a year or so , came the "Plus" version.
I first started with a standard version, then moved on to a
"Plus" enhanced unit about a year later. The "plus"
version is still minus the NB7030 board installed, which adds the
Notch and Noise Blanker functions. The "Plus" version
is still worth the extra money if you can afford it. But the
"Standard" can have it's good points vs the "Plus"
version with an issue on the tuning encoder "knob".
At one time owning a "Standard" and a "Plus"
unit together, and doing side by side tests using the same
antenna, I could not find any major performance differences
between the two. The real differences I like in the "Plus"
version, are the enhanced processor which gives many more
memories (400),and the alpha tags. The added optical encoder used
with the tuning knob is somewhat of an improvement. The
mechanical encoder found in the "Standard" Unit will
jump frequencies a bit at times and this is very annoying. The
"Plus" unit never skips a beat. But after a number of
years of owning both versions, the mechanical "tuning knob"
encoder in the "Standard" version seems to hold up much
better with time.
The reason why I find this to be true is on the "plus"
version is that after some use,say 6~8 months of normal use (it
uses a Bourns Optical encoder for the tuning knob) I
found a "up and down-left to right play feeling" to
show up with the TUNING KNOB. This gives the knob a "wobble-loose"
feel as you have used it after awhile . Again, This has something
to do with the Bourns optical encoder that is used in the "plus"
unit (the bearing gets shimed out or something ??). You do not
notice this when the set is new. To me this is a pretty major
flaw and should not be in a $1500.00 radio !! The "Standard"
model has very little added play even after 2 years of use (Alps
Mfg.) . This is at least on the samples I have used . I'm very
careful with equipment and do not misuse it..so all that you read
here..is in a "light" use situation. The optical
encoder used with the Plus version is Bourns part ENA1J-B28-L00100.
It is NOT the ball bearing version of this
encoder that is being used which is a pity.
The "Sync Detector" and Audio Quality
Audio quality is where the AR7030 really shines for me. Now of
course starting with the proper bandwidths is just as important.
And the 7030's bandwidth's were very well chosen in my book. I
like the (almost) 10khz filter, so I can open the receiver up
when conditions are there, and to get the most out of the sync
detection you really need this along with adjustment of the PBT
control (I know some will really cringe on this comment).It
drives me nuts to see manufactures stopping at 6khz or so.
| IF Filter | "Standard" |
approx. bw | "Plus" |
approx. bw |
| X3 | CFW455HT | 6 Khz (6.8) | CFK455J (metal case) | 3 Khz (3.8) |
| X4 | CFW455IT | 4 Khz (5.1) | CFW455IT | 4 Khz (5.1) |
| X5 | CFJ455K14 (metal case) | 2 Khz (2.1) | CFJ455K14 (metal case) | 2 Khz (2.1) |
| X6 | CFU455G2 | 8 Khz (9.5) | CFU455G2 | 8 Khz (9.5) |
| X7 | open | open | ||
X8 |
open |
open |
Murata ceramic IF
bandwidth filters included as stock. The "plus" version
uses a narrower filter on X3. Bandwidths in "(x.x
)" is a approx.
area what the receiver will actually display and closer to what
the filter bandwidth really is. With the optional FL-124 daughter
board one can make use of the larger crystal JRC filters. Between an
additional CFU455G2 filter being used at the second 455 Khz IF
amp (Q30) and 2 "IF Tail" filters (the wider tail
filter is even another CFU455G2) following the second IF amp
stage , will not allow the AR7030 to use wider bandwidth filters
over 8 Khz (9.5).
(Dave
Z. Chart)
The
receiver I had in my "Best Sync" detector list, before
the AR7030 was the Sony ICF-2010. However the Sony's sync would
still distort on the deepest part of a fade. A-B comparisons over
the time I owned the AR7030's have really proved this out for me.
Not only does the AR-7030 Sync circuit contains less distortion,
it does not cut off the lower audio frequencies as does the Sony.
It not quite all wine and roses however. The audio on the high
end is very clean when using the sync mode, however I can
somtimes still hear very tiny amount of distortion on very deep
fades that still creeps in there, line outputs or speaker/headphone
outputs (Bass and Treble at both at "Max"). It's one of
those more good things than bad (remember I'm extremely picky)
and many will not even notice this. I have my all of my receivers
tied into the hi-fi as well so I can detect more audio gremlins
over the normal user. The "sync" audio quality is not
100% perfect in my view with this remaining fading distortion
gremlin, but is still is one of the best (if not the best) in the
audio department for a table top HF receiver.
"Heterodyne with the Sync ....
And speaking of a gremlin with the audio....there is another one,
but is still minor and for all of what the AR7030 does with audio
with the sync on, and I don't worry about it. It's a small low
level heterodyne that appears, you can change the tone of this
"het" with the PBS control. But you will not get rid of
it totally. This has not really bothered me that much. For the
record here is what Richard Hillier of AOR UK sent me a couple of
years ago on this. More of a intrest to "tech" types, I
would NEVER do what is detailed below, it really is not that bad..but
nevertheless is with us.
From : Richard Hillier(AOR UK)
We are aware of the comment you have made regarding sync
detection on your AR7030, they are a common characteristic to all
AR7030's.
Heterodynes... JT has generated a response for this held in file:
Subject: AR7030 Sync detector heterodynes
Well, I was wondering when someone would mention the background
heterodynes on the 7030's Sync AM mode. Given a few more
components, a bit more PCB space and a bit more money (all in
short supply) the problem could be fixed, but as it is there's
just a good old engineering compromise.
The effects come from harmonic mixing in the Sync Car mixer where
the Sync VCO is combined with the DDS signal (check it out on the
block diagram). Mostly the spurii are at least 40dB down and are
barely audible on a well- modulated AM signal, but their level
and pitch are dependent on alignment, PBS setting and temperature.
A small adjustment of VR3 will move them around and you may be
able to improve things. You can always return to the factory
settings if needed. No damage will occur to the receiver from
adjusting VR2 or VR3.
A further improvement may be obtained by reducing the value of R109
(I suggest adding 4k7 or 10k in parallel). This increases the
injection into the product detector and helps to suppress AM
sidebands on the carrier signal. The downside of this is that
carrier coupling into the IF chain is increased, and this may
result in a small residual S-meter reading on LSB or USB mode at
certain PBS control settings. The carrier leakage into the IF is
by magnetic coupling between the carrier filter (X13) and the
selected IF filter, so it is dependent on bandwidth and may not
occur at all with a Kiwa filter.
"And No Background Hiss In AM or Sync Mode's"
Many of the receivers that I have owned over the years have
suffered from background "Hiss".Even with the volume
control all the way down this hiss still existed. The JRC NRD-525
that I used to own was a good example, just downright awful. The
NRD-535 had improved on this hiss, however at the cost of the
overall audio quality. The AR 7030 was a very pleasant suprise.
No hiss..period (AM and Sync modes), and not at the expense of
audio quality like clipping off the high's. Matter of fact after
hearing my first signals coming out of a AR 7030, my JRC NRD-535D
was no longer my prized receiver.
However the SSB modes don't fair quite as well with hiss. In my
tests, it's a bit excessive in the narrowest bandwidth (treble at
max), appears to be more so with the 2 later samples that I have
owned . This is more true when receiving weaker signals, but it
can be a bit hard on the ears after awhile. But again using AM or
Sync modes, it was not a issue for me.
Frequency Display "very close"
Another issue that has always rubbed me the wrong way over the
years is, why do so many frequency displays on SW receivers read
off (out of the box brand new) from what is actually being
received. I will give JRC a good mark here as I have never seen a
JRC off of any real measure . But the ICOM's , Kenwoods and Yaesu's
that I have all used over the years have been off, sometimes by a
couple of khz's. Again the AR 7030 wins good here..maybe it's
just taking the time to align the circuits correctly, and/ or
very good design. My # 7 and # 8 last sample "Plus"
versions were both about 10 Hz off (high). Not perfect, but not
bad either.
The "Line" (record) Outputs
I enjoy making recordings off the SW bands, broadcasting stations,
pirate stations, whatever. So the level and quality coming out of
the receiver's "Line Out" is most important to me.
Again the 7030 is above average using the Sync mode. Very clean
"line" signals, and there are 2 totally independent
outputs. Also you can adjust on the front panel either output for
a excellent match to whatever recording device you have connected
to it. The only gremlin in this dept. is that they are using a 5-pin
DIN here, and if you are going to roll your own plug, it does get
a bit tight in the plug for the person weak in soldering. I have
been using a couple of pieces of Belden micro-coax RG174 (8216)
with very good results. However, you might want to keep the
length below 6 ft as there is a bit if resistance in this stuff
if you get too long. SSB modes do not fare as well (at least on
the 6 samples I have owned). It does have a certain amount of
hiss that does indeed irk out of the "line" outputs as
well
A Few Hints:
Here are a few little hints, if you are planning on grabbing onto
one someday. A couple of items that I did right after I pulled a
sample out of the box. Otherwise I find the radio to either, may
not sound right, or doing something a bit strange to what I'm
used to. None of there are serious , just operational notes and
are of course subjective .
- Hit the double "O"'s (on/off switch) button and hit
the "Cnfg" button. Rotate the spin wheel until you get
to the RF GAIN mode. I find that "Man" works best (auto
mode is a pain) ,in the auto mode the attenutator will click on
and off if the signal gets strong enough (It uses a relay) .This
becomes annoying, because it tends to switch on and off and on
and off if the signals hit just right. I have never seen this
radio overload yet on my 60 ft longwire. I did not need for this
Auto mode at least in the USA.
- Obtain some little stick on rubber feet, from the hardware
store, or Radio Shack sells some little flat black ones (but of
course are overpriced at RS). Attach these to the bottom of the
remote control. I place 4 on the corners, the ones on the battery
cover end you want to keep on the cover. Add one more right in
the center. Now you can place the remote control flat on the
table,use it like a mouse right next to the radio. Simple but
effective. Stick 4 on the bottom of the power supply "Floor
Wart" while you are at it.
- The use of a external speaker is a must. This is the case with
most tabletop receivers anyway and with the AR7030 is no
different. I use SMALLER OLDER 2-way die-cast
Realistic hi-fi speaker(s). The Realistic Minimus-77 cat # 40-2054
and the Realistic Minimus 7 cat # 40-2045 (both from the late 80's~early
90's) are the ONLY ones to use from my testing over the years.
The tweeter helps very much here. However with any external
speaker used with the AR7030, be sure that the speaker has a 8
Ohms rating. The receiver's specification's state this, and a
note I received from AOR-UK stated, OK to use a 4 ohm but do not
turn it up to max. I would just use a 8 Ohm and play it safe.
NOTE: I have tried all of Radio Shack's more
current metal cased 2-way speakers and they all requied too much
power to drive them (so that was a total bust). These older 40-2054
and 40-2045' speakers do not have this problem for some reason.
The downside is that being the age that these are, the foam/rubber
around the outer edge of the woofer can break down, so beware.
- The cabinet screws MUST not be overtightned.
This is stated in the manual, and believe it ! My first 7030
screws were striped by the first North American Importer (we will
not say names here, but used to be in VA). But if you ever need
to open the case to install additional filters etc., obtain the
correct 2.5mm hex key and follow the instructions in the manual.
Just as important is to ALWAYS remove the "BOTTOM"
cover FIRST and REPLACE it LAST (that is the last cover you put
on). Otherwise the pieces may not fit right. Even with those
warnings, it is not a easy set to take apart, the paint chips
very easy. Another point to remember is every time you remove the
screws on this set, a few micro-metal filings like to fly around
inside the cabinet. It's soft metal used with self tapping screws
is the reason here. Give it a good upside down shake before you
put the covers back on. Maybe even taking a small "Clean"
brush around the holes (areas too) might not be a bad idea as
well before you button it up for any loose ones that will not
shake out ??
- Watch that antenna switch in the rear. If you are using a
external antenna, be sure that you keep the switch in the "Normal"
mode. Intermod will happen in peak signal times if you try and
use the "Whip" selection. This is common sense here,
but you can loose track of the status of this switch as it's in
the rear of the radio and no indicator on the front.
- To maybe help reduce problems with the "Tuning Knob -
Shaft Play" (Wobble) down the road, Do Not use the
"Dimple" on the front of the knob for any fast tuning.
If you get in the habit at the start "Not To Use It"
when the set is brand new, it may help on this problem (I have
not varified this) ? The "Bourns" optical (Tuning
Knob) encoder seems to have more problems with the shaft being
shimed over time with use (and you get that wobble) and I'm
thinking that this could be part of the problem (comments about
this subject near the top of this page)? If you wish to tune fast,
use the "fast" button.This works better anyway.
- Keep space around the "power supply". The included
"Floor Wart" 15 volt supply runs very hot after a bit
of operation (at least the USA version/117 VAC). So keep plently
of air space around it, and don't set it on a carpet or stack
anything on top or around it. Give it room to keep cool and you
should be OK ?? (I have now received a few reports of failures
with these supplies, more than likely due to heat stress).
Important updated information with the "RF Atten step" setting in configuration menu (Plus versions) |
| This is SOLID
information direct from AOR UK (I'm uncertain if this
would affect eariler Plus versions ?). Of course with the
standard version this will not even show up in the Config
menu. The RF Atten step in the configuration menu (Plus versions only) should be left set to 10dB steps as default out of the box , do NOT set it to 20dB. This is because the preamp interleave is removed to maintain best dynamic range. Current AR7030-PLUS certificates supplied in the carton with each Plus receiver states this (wording just above the serial number). "Note: Attenuator should be set to 10dB steps (even if the NB7030 / UPNB7030 option is fitted), this results in the attenuator selection of +10dB, 0dB, -10dB, -20dB for the PLUS unit (-30dB and -40dB being omitted)." (This is corrected information vs. what is found in the AR7030 "features" FPU manual on page 3) |
![]()
The
AOR AR7030 next to a black Realistic "Minimus 7" 2-way
die-cast speaker. (cat # 40-2045)
Gone from the marketplace since the early 90's, this speaker can
still be purchased used at flea markets and on ebay.
Be careful hunting as many samples have foam/rubber destruction
around the edges.
(see
text above, photo: Dave Z.)
The "Dreaded"
Bourns Spin Wheels and "My" History with the set
I was very happy with my first AR7030 which was a "Standard"
unit, serial number was a bit over 100700. But only after 8
months or so, I was not able to turn up the volume control all
the time. It actually got so bad after awhile that I was unable
to use the control at all. You could still use the remote to
adjust the volume. I did get that volume encoder replaced in time
(after a few trips back to the now "out of business"
importer). But I felt that it was just a bad sample and that was
it for the second.
After being so pleased with the overall performance and audio
quality I went for another "Standard" unit , and then
even a third unit which was a "Plus" unit. At that time
#1 went to a new owner (after being properly repaired).
Well again after 8 months or so AGAIN, I could not adjust the
volume control all the time on my new "Plus" Unit. To
make matters worse the "< > "
were also starting to fail. Also my local friend who also
purchased a AR7030 Plus at the same time that I did, was also
having the same failures. Now it's getting real intresting.
These 2 controls used a "Mechanical" rotary encoder
made by "Bourns". We (and AOR UK) use a term "Spin
Wheels" in this text, do not confuse these with the encoder
used in the tuning knob (not the same type or Mfg of encoder).
AOR UK's responce
AOR UK was starting to admit to a few reported failures (they
have NEVER admited that there was a real problem here 100%), but
not of any great nature....(yeh right).Here is a reply that I
received from AOR UK from Dec 1998 on this problem.
"The problem surrounding the Bourns click encoders is not
as simple as it first appears. Not all failures are for the same
reason.
Given the number of AR7030 receivers we have sold, you would
expect that if the problem were due to tarnishing of the metal
deposited on the substrate the service request for replacement
encoders would be enormous. Whilst any failure is a great cause
for concern, and this particular one occurs too regularly to be
ignored, I can tell you that the numbers are not great.
As I think you are aware, we receive no direct input from Bourns
regarding any quality issue. Bourns will only deal through their
supplying distributor. This has meant that though a number of
replacement encoders have been supplied, there seems little
desire on our distributor, or possibly Bourns part, to actually
address the problem.
As I said, the failures are not all clear cut. Any sample of this
encoder, when opened reveals a similar level of tarnishing to
that which your picture shows, whether it is fully functional or
faulty. This has led me to investigate the problem further.
The failures I have seen have a short of a few thousand Ohms
between the centre pin and either of the outer ones. This short
seems to be very close to the pins, rather than on the contact
area of the substrate. This is checked when the substrate is
removed from the encoder body as the one in your picture.
During design and manufacture the Bourns part has been evaluated
and seemed suitable in every respect, it is regrettable that long
term this has not been proved to be the case. Ultimately my
preferred course of action is to use a different manufacturers
part. Unfortunately, the PCB and front panels are designed to
take only the Bourns part. No other manufacturers unit is even
remotely compatible physically making retro fitting of other
parts difficult or impossible. This does not preclude a change
being made in any subsequent production however as PCB's etc can
be re designed.
Naturally, if we are able to devise a way of fitting say an Alps
part in this application we will make this modification available
to existing users who's Bourns encoders fail. I would however
stress that even most of the earliest sets have not suffered
failure, so there is no reason to suppose that a replacement
encoder will fail, once it has been fitted.
Best Regards
Mark W Sumner
(Production Controller)"
"My Views on the "Spin Wheels"
They could not really come down why these were failing. I have my
own theory. And mind you this not solid information, only my
ideas.
I tore a semi-defective "wheel" apart , it looks like
tarnish might be one of the problems ? Have a look at the picture
below, I have taken a pencil eraser and cleaned off 1/4 of the
encoder's track to show the tarinsh. Also whatever Bourns used to
lub this wheel with (if anything) sure does not last. I can feel
a very dried out greasy "somthing" on it, but as you
can see, no longer doing it's job. I don't think it's not all one
problem. I still think half of the blame still goes to the "gray"
poop that is on the track (see picture). However, now the
real problem I think lies with the 3 little copper "wippers"
that make contact with the track. You can actually just blow a
bit on these and make them bend them (puts heavy damage on them
too). They are very very thin and have no real spring to them (well
not enough..that's for sure).
Well
we did get a couple of "Spin Wheel" replacement parts (same
Bourns part) for both units (mine and my friends) as they were
still in warranty. All 4 (2 in each unit) were replaced and back
to normal, but I was not feeling very good about the situation
and the # 3 plus unit left me to another owner after being
repaired
I have received many e-mails over the last years from others who
have also experenced failures of these "Bourns" spin
wheels.
This message was from Robert Gibson via the AR7030 mailing list.
"My 7030 is on it's third spin wheel and second
replacement push button (soft key). Also, the shaft of the tuning
encoder is getting slack, causing the tuning knob to wobble. Not
good considering the radio is only just over two years old. I
like the receiver, but am worried about the prospect of having to
keep replacing these parts."
The "Improved" version announced
In June of 1999, I received this information from AOR UK:
David
Since my last email to you regarding the AR7030 on 19 January
this year,we have addressed the Bourns click encoder issue using
an Alps part. The PCB design for the new production control unit
has been altered to accommodate the new controls as they are not
a physical direct replacement for the Bourns part.
This change together with a change to the manufacturer of the LCD
display (providing better visibility over a wider viewing angle
and improved contrast) has taken place in the latest production
run which has just commenced.
We have also produced a small additional PCB that enables the
mounting of the Alps click encoders on sets originally fitted
with the Bourns part. This board complete with encoders and
fitting instructions is available at GBP 20.00 to those who wish
to fit the new encoders to their sets, however as we have pointed
out before, it is not the easiest job in the world to change the
click encoders and there is little point in taking this approach
on sets where the original encoders exhibit no signs of a problem.
In warranty repairs to any AR7030 having a click encoder problem
may, at the discretion of the dealer concerned, use the
additional PCB modification to replace the Bourns parts. The
mystery still remains as to why certain encoders fail whilst the
vast majority remain in operation without showing any problems.
Because of this, it is probably best to avoid needless
intervention into an AR7030 that is still functioning perfectly
normally.
Regards
Mark W Sumner
Additional from Mark dated June 1999, indicates a "Serial
Number" that these will be starting from. Standard and
"Plus" units.
Hello David
The changes to the AR7030 spin wheel encoders and display will
apply to both plus and standard sets.
The starting serial number for the new production is
102050.
So if you purchase a sample over this serial number, you should
be clear on that front.
Back to Bourns with the Vol and < > spin wheels.
AOR UK is now back using a Bourns part for the Vol and
< > wheels again. Sorry, I do not have any additional
information or part numbers on this. At least it's a more modern
part and did not go back to the larger black ones. They have a
die cast case just the old Alps ones used for many years (see KT6LN's
picture below)
Do we have a issue even with the newer "Bourns" encoders ? (volume and "< >") |
New
"Bourns" photo provided by Ismail KT6LN Above are pictures of
the old Bourns Volume and < >
encoder on the left and the latest Bourns part being used
on the right. |
The
"New" unit (s)..one defective
So after hearing all of this great news, I decided to go for unit
number 4 with the new serial number and improvememts .
Number 4 arrived in good shape, however it was defective. First
the Tuning knob had a very ruff feeling to it, like it was
rubbing on something. The other and even worse problem was the
fact that the external speaker jack was not working . Now I use a
external speaker just about all of the time with my 7030. I use a
very carefully chosen wire and phone plug, very flexable short
light 20 ga wire to keep stress off of the jack. Well this one
would not cut out the internal speaker all the way and the
connection to the external was not there (aboout 50-50). Maybe a
certain amount of tarnish was on the contacts in this "Jack",
or the metal just does not return correctly to "reconnect"
the internal speaker right..whatever ?? Anyway it went back to
the dealer as a new defective..pronto. This problem I know can
happen in time with the jack becomming "Flaky" after
awhile in time, but I have never heard it happen "New out of
the Box". Not a major problem maybe..however should this be
on a radio with a $ 1500. price tag..?? Yep..another gremlin to
be aware of down the road or be aware of before a purchase. It's
a super cheapo jack being used here, would not be too hard to
replace with a better one.
The "Big" Number 5
Well now onto my sample # 5. A few comments here. Of course the
new "Alps" spin wheels have a much better feel to them,
aside from a bit of a "grizzly" feeling when rotated (only
when new..after a bit of use this feeling has gone away). It
would seem that these will hold up better with use ?? Time will
tell ??
The LCD display does indeed have a brighter/sharper look to it. A
couple of points that I have discovered on this "New"
display.
A picture below of the" New vs the Old Display" on # 5.
This picture does not show a big diffrence,and it's not a real
major change but a bit more than what the photo shows. But it
does look a bit darker and shaper on the new version, provided
you have the control adjusted right. The way you adjust the
contrast on the new versions is a bit weird. The shapest and
darkest is sort of in the middle and not where you think it would
be in the area of the control. This does help being a bit sharper,
but still does not offset it's small size and my eye's still can
get tired of it all after a few hours staring at it.
The
display on my # 5 sample responded a bit slower to tuning, that
is "Slug-ish". You really notice this more when the set
is cold. My "standard" unit showed nothing of the sort.
This does clear for the most part after the set warms up awhile.
# 6 has none of this display issue.
Another action of the LCD display is when the set is "cold
vs warm", the contrast varies a bit. You want to adjust it
on it's rear control when it's warm (say 1 hour or so), and leave
it. Weird to say the least. The LCD brightness of the
backlighting on every AR7030 that I have had so far gets dimmer
with use (as time goes on).
A VERY strange quirk noticed with the # 5 sample (New type)
display when the set is OFF. When off it still has a mild
backlight which allows you to sort of see the clock. Well as the
seconds click off, it strobes (flashes) a bit at each second.
Never seen this on any of the 3 other units before (did not have
#4 long enough to check that out). Another weird gremlin to say
the least !!! It does not show this when it's on.
The even"Bigger" Number 6 , 7 and 8
On to sample number 6 for me (another Plus version), very
good news is the "Slug-ish" display problem was not an
issue anymore (totally gone). Also the external speaker jack was
also just fine . It appears that these problems have both been
cleared up.
Number 7 (Plus) had the new remote control included and indeed
this was major improvement to the old one. More on this below in
the "Misc" section.
| N9EWO's Approx. Serial Numbers Owned : AOR AR7030 |
| # 1 Standard Version : 10075x # 2 Standard Version : 10081x # 3 Plus Version : 10157x # 4 Plus Version : 1020xx (defective out of the box) # 5 Plus Version : 1020xx # 6 Plus Version : 1036xx # 7 Plus Version : 1037xx # 8 Plus Version : 1039xx |
So you see a "Fast charge" indication appear on the LCD display , but the internal BP123 battery option is not installed ? |
| Here is
one that I have first hand experience with after
receiving back one of the earlier samples from the
various repairs over the years. When I first contacted
AOR UK with this, they had no clue what was going on (I
think they thought I was nuts). But now I see they have
covered this in a bulletin on the AOR UK Web site . If for some reason you see a "Fast charge" indication appear in the top line in the LCD after you turn the set off (right of the clock numbers), and you do not have the option even installed, it is nothing to worry about. With the BP123 lead battery option not installed and if a small power glitch happens in the power grid (this can happen even with the set off, but still connected to the power supply) , the microprocessor can get fooled and thinks is has detected the internal lead acid battery. It of course never gets the job done being there is no battery to recharge. The cure is to leave the power supply connected with the receiver switched off. The "Fast charge" indication will continue to be displayed for about 2 hours and then it will display "Std charge" . At this time you can switch the set back on and then after you power it off again this time, all should be happy. You should have no more charge indication on the LCD after you turn it back off. If you still do, sorry to say I do not have any idea's for you. Do not disturb the powered off receiver by unplugging the power supply or switching it on and off. The timer will reset and you have to start all over again. |
The
AOR AR7030 "Data Master" Control Software - Demo
Version (Revised)
WARNING
: I will NOT be held responsible for any information that
is listed here |
After
a few questions that were answered for me from AOR UK that the
AOR "Data Master" AR7030 software does indeed support
the "Alpha Tags" . I downloaded the "Demo"
version of "DataMaster" for this set on the AOR UK web site - software . The Demo version only runs
for 10 mins a shot, and you can not fetch or save files. The
price for a real version of the software in the US was about a
"whoppin" $ 220.00 when it came out (whew....!!). The
price is now much more reasonable then it was, now in the $ 40 (US)
area.
After you connect a proper cable (uses a weird 240 deg 5 pin DIN
plug, see owners manual for details), you bring up the program
and select the proper "Com" port that the cable its
connected to. It supports ports 1 to 4. The real reason that I
wanted to try this program was to upload the data into the set.
It does allow you of course to control the radio from 3 different
"Radio" view types, but that part does not intrest me
at all.
With only 10 mins before your session turns off with the demo
version, you really cannot enter all of your data and upload to
the radio. Also with the demo version there is no way to retrive
or store data to a file that you could bring up to send, another
brick wall. I found a way to make it work anyway so that I could
upload a stack of frequencies with the alpha tags.
Here's the strange way I did it (using XP home). First I opened a
new file, downloaded a segment of frequencies
into the datamaster memory file window from the radio. This will
take a couple of mins (don't cancel out of it). You work with (and
should never try to work with more than what the program calls
for at a time) 100 memories at a time. In this screen it allows
you to copy/cut/paste, just like a word processor. So I took this
output and transfered it to good old "wordpad"
where you can save this working .txt file). NOTE : I would not
use any other word processing program. I named 4 files for
editing, one as "memory0~99.txt", "memory100~199.txt".....etc.
I just worked from this "template" (keeping the spacing
exactly as the downloaded template)...again
entered all and stored this 4 different pieces/files 000~099, 100~199,
200~299, 300~399. When entering the Alpha's and you do not use
all of the 14 that you can use, fill in the empty spaces using
the space bar, otherwise you might see garbage on that entry (memory
channel) when you upload it.
Before you trot off and start to edit the "txt" files
with your memory channel information, do one thing before you
close the datamaster program. Select "Filters" under
the "Setup" bar and provide the filter information to
the program (and save it to the "ini" file as indicated)
for YOUR actual sample. If you do not the filter numbers will not
match up. You use the actual filter numbers as displayed on YOUR
set in the memory files, but you MUST do this in order for it to
work. If you do any filter calibration routines after you finish
the txt files, you will have to re-enter all of the filter data
if the numbers don't match up.
| Data Master "txt"
file format example. Make note of upper and
lower case. I used "notepad" for editing. Numbered area at far right (123456789...etc) is for the 14 char. alpha tags and is used with the FPU7030 enhanced processor only. See the FPU7030 manual for valid character use. If you are not using the FPU7030, that that area is left blank ?? Only have to worry over to the 0% heading right (this is the SQL Level) ?? (I'm not 100% certain on this as do not have a standard version anymore to run testing). |
| " - " =
space 001 - - - - 945.00 - - AM - bw5.1 - - - PBS - 0.0 - kHz - - SQ - - 0% - - - - - - - 12345678901234 002 - - - 9545.00 - SNC - bw3.7 - - - PBS + 4.2 - kHz - - SQ - - 0% - - - - - - - 12345678901234 003 - - 14000.00 - USB - bw2.1 - - - PBS - 4.2 - kHz - - SQ - - 0% - - - - - - - 12345678901234 |
When
you are ready to upload the stuff back up to the receiver, open
up a new file again . Do another blank download
from the radio on whatever 100 memory segment you are working
with (again). I found that you have to download THAT numbered
segment that you want to work with first BEFORE you paste
anything to it for upload (if you do not do this it will not work).
Once you do that then open up YOUR "Wordpad" data
file in another window (using wordpad again) , and paste it over
from that to the working memory window in datamaster. You will
have to use the Paste function on the top menu bar on datamaster
as you will have no right click in the memory window. Then (and
only then AFTER your paste from the wordpad file !!), you will
need to cut out the existing one that just came from the radio
which will still be on the bottom of this file window. This I
think is the trick how you can make it work ?? You might say
already to do it.....hold it bunkey..you should hit the "Renumber"
function first..just to be safe.
So now hit the "Upload To Radio" and wait for a good 2~3
mins or so and hope that it does not error on you ??. The set
will be locked up while it is doing this, so don't touch the
receiver at all while it's doing this (go grab a cool one). And
then it should be just fine....well not quite. It should take
about couple of mins. I found sometimes (not always), it locks up,
errors with the good old "Windows Error" tune...or
works fine. However, it's a flaky operation at best. I have found
that it leaves garbage in the "Alpha's" on some entries.
Mind you it usually turns out to be only a couple that get messed
up out of the 100, like a lost letter in a line, or the wrong
letter, or gets left blank all together. About the only way to
correct this is to just go back over it manually afterwords and
correct the glitches and this has worked for me. A little note
here, if you have problems on the first try, do not give up...somtimes
it took me 3 tries to get one upload to work once. Don't give up.
Also fetching the data from the set do it this way (not always) ,
I get a few holes in the data, say missing a couple of memory
channels that I know are in there.
Be sure and shut down the program and restart it again to do
another 100 memory chunk. Remember you only have 10 mins before
it shuts down.
This "Demo" program allows you to check it out OK. It's
at a MUCH better price than it was when it first came out too. It
still does some strange things, but it works. On the downside is
it's pretty much impossiable to purchase within the USA.
See the AOR UK web site for
current pricing on the full version.
So
do I still like this set ??
I still very much like the AR7030 in a number of respects.
Details that other radio mfg's have totally missed (like audio
quality) have been handled extremely well in this set. It was
good to see the spin wheel (Vol and "< >" knobs)
problem cleared up, but still have a very bad taste in my mouth
still seeing other misc problems.
As you can see after a few years of owning 7 (8 now if you count
the dud out of the box) samples of this receiver it has turned
into a very mixed bag. Even with it's great performance and good
audio quality on AM SYNC mode, the set still struggled
with quality control and/or actual construction and parts used.
Dave N9EWO
ver 9.0
© 2008 N9EWO
Discontinued
Receiver
Mr.
Gremlin says "Hello" ![]()
Another Part that can fail, the external speaker jack (NOTE:
this problem appears to have been fixed.....see main text above
for the latest):
Well this one actually has been covered on the internet elsewhere....but
now I too have experenced it. It involves the 1/8 inch phone jack
used for the external speaker. Now I use a external speaker just
about all of the time with my 7030', but once in awhile I might
move the set into another room (it's rare), and use the internal
speaker. Of course pull the plug out. I use a very carefully
chosen wire and phone plug, very flexable short 20 ga wire to
keep stress off of the jack. Well either a certain amount of
tarnish is building up on contacts in this "Jack", or
the metal just does not return correctly to "reconnect"
the internal speaker right ??
Anyway with the #4 dud sample, it became very intermittent when I
tried to use the internal speaker with one of my "Standard"
units (I no longer own this sample). When I pushed the plug in
and out a few times, that helped and was halfway useable fow
awhile. Even if I jiggle the plug slightly when I use the
external speaker, it cuts in and out a bit. Not a major problem..however
should this be on a radio with a $ 1500 price tag..?? Yes, this
is another gremlin to be aware of, but this one may not be of a
panic nature ?
Below
are comments that I have received from others. May or may not
relate to my comments that I have above. A few comments from me
thrown in as well. Someone who is just starting to read this
section...you might want to start at the bottom and read up, as
most current entries are at the top.
I have text file in a "Microsoft Word" format and can
be downloaded here.
Parts may be repeated from the data below , however much more
added as well. It's a bit over 100K large. There are from the
time frame between 1997 and 1999 and may or may not be valid
anymore. Here for the general information only.
Remote
control change : Approx. serial
numbers over 103670
In October 2005, a new remote
control marked as the V2 IR7030 (referred to as IR7030-2) was
started to be included with new production. The replacement is
slightly larger in overall size and has a number of larger
buttons to boot. Sadly it will NOT work with older firmware
versions and one will have to PURCHASE not only the new remote
but also an updated firmware IC (microprocessor). For more
information see the link below on the AOR UK web page (subject to
change).
Version 2 infrared
hand controller - AOR UK Web Page (IR7030-2)
![]()
Old IR7030 remote (left) used for almost 10 years, the new IR7030-2
(right) from October 2005.
(AOR UK photo)
Mark
at AOR UK has some additional insight with the LCD display in the
newer AR7030's . He claims that the older unit's also suffer this
same happening when cold (but not as bad). I have never noticed
it on any of my other units that I have had or any other LCD
display in other equipment...at least not this bad. Hummm??? So
for what it is worth...duh what was that again you say ???
Hi David,
It would appear that the difference in contrast between cold and
warm is a facet of the behaviour of the liquid crystal itself
with temperature. The result is the requirement for a slightly
different voltage on the contrast line to produce the same
contrast result between the two temperatures.
Similar displays to that used in the AR7030 that operate to lower
temperatures require a wider swing on the contrast voltage line,
but actually recommend temperature compensation on the contrast
input to maintain an even contrast result with temperature
variation as the variation in contrast is more extreme. The issue
is related to low temperature rather than high temperature
conditions and concerns the speed of liquid crystal response at
lower temperatures. These low temperatures are outside the normal
operating range of any domestic equipment.
Incidentally, the same effect was apparent on the previous
manufacturers display but the lower level of available contrast
made it appear far less noticeable.
Best Regards
Mark
A reply listed below on the weird "moving around" of
the LCD contrast level on the latest production runs. You can
live with this, however I have never seen this on a set to this
date with a LCD screen. I think that a note with new sets should
be included to indicate this. Turn the set on, let it warm up ay
30 min to an hour...THEN adjust the contrast control..and leave
it alone after that.
Reply from Mark of AOR UK:
Hi David
Your observations on the contrast variation between cold and warm
on new display are correct and are a facet of this particular
display, however we considered it a minor issue that was out-weighed
by the advantages.
We looked at other displays before deciding on the one chosen
however they required the use of a large negative voltage for
production of the increased contrast level. This would have
required an inverter circuit with all the attendant (potential)
noise problems.
Best Regards
Mark
A reply from Mark of AOR UK on the missing "die-cast can".This
clears up most of the points made below. Just as I was thinking
here...the Q47 problem. The eddystone comment was wrong as
another company is still making these die-cast cans. Check out
the web site (link below). But I still have a problem in the back
of my mind with this missing ?? You can make what you want from
this information. I wish to thank AOR UK again for responding to
this matter.
"Hello David"
"As you have observed, the larger of the die cast boxes is
indeed absent on the latest production run of the AR7030. The
decision to omit the can was taken, as you quite rightly surmise,
because of the stress it places on the PCB around Q47. We have
always been aware that the level of radiation from the DDS system
was low, however before deciding to omit the box extensive
testing of the receiver was performed to check for the presence
of any additional spurious radiation."
"I note the differences in reception shown by your real
audio files, however this type of difference is actually unlikely
to be a result of the missing box. It must be said that there are
variations between production sets that are still within
specification caused by many things, typically the change in
manufacturers of a part which conforms to the same overall
specification. Logic IC's are a prime example of this, also the
variation in ceramic filter characteristics. Not withstanding
this we will carry out more comparative tests."
"Incidentally I notice you have observed that Eddystone have
ceased manufacturing the die cast boxes. This is true, however
they are still manufactured by Hammond manufacturing who bought
the business at the end of 1998. (take a look at www.hammondmfg.com for more details). The
issue of obsolete parts has always been a consideration in the
design of the AR7030. Basically in small scale production it is
always necessary to be aware of the 'design-in' of very
specialist parts which might go out of production. The most
obvious case here was the Plessey SL6440CDP IF chip which had
actually ceased production when the AR7030 began (though further
manufacturing by Plessey did actually take place due to demand).
We bought, and still hold large stocks of this part, though new
stock still shows up on suppliers lists even now."
"As usual your comments and observations are appreciated."
Best Regards
Mark W Sumner
(Production Controller)
A reply on this subject from Ben Wallace . He makes a few good
points here. How about it AOR...for pepole who want it..send them
the missing "can" (top and bottom and the 4 screws), as
long as it would not throw anything off from factory alignment ??
I had sent AOR UK a Real Audio file showing lower background
noise on my older standard unit (recording has both sets, A-B
comparison in it).
Hi Dave,
The response from AOR doesn't wash with me.
I develop and bring to production cellular phones and can tell
you that shields can be a MAJOR problem with all electronic
products, and my cellular products in general.
First of all.....From an engineering standpoint, the AOR
development team obviously decided that a shield was originally
needed for the production receivers.
Since they have ommittted the shield, you have seen a difference
in performance of the versions of receivers, with and without the
shielded circuit.
In their reply to you, AOR stated that they have always been
aware that the level of radiation from the DDS system was low,
however before deciding to omit the box (shield -- let's call it
what it is) extensive testing of the receiver was performed to
check for the presence of any additional spurious radiation.....
If that is the case, why did they use a shield in the first place???
No commercial manufacturer puts more into a product than
absolutely necessary.
These questions still need to be answered. Did they have problems
placing the shield in their "pick and place" machines?
Did they suffer from automated soldering problems? Were the
shields "hand placed" and "hand soldered" in
the manufacturing process??? How did they know that excessive
stress was occuring around Q47? Returns (RMAs)?
AOR states that perhaps the differences in reception shown by
your real audio files could have been caused by ..."the
change in manufacturers of a part which conforms to the same
overall specification....." Imagine you go down to the Ford
dealer and buy a part for you car that doesn't work as well as
the original.......where-upon the parts dealer tells you that it
is an exact replacement made to the same specifications as the
original.....what would you think?
Ben
I had a peek in my "Above 102050 serial no" Plus 7030.
Actually did NOT have to take it apart. I just shinned a little
flashlight/penlight with a focused lens into one of the small 2
little holes on the rear cabinet and used the eye ball in the
other..weird but it worked. Well as was indicated below (see
below on this page for more info) my new sample is sure "missing"
this "Die-Cast" shielded case (Left one). I cannot see
this enhancing the operation of the set ?? I have noticed more
background noise on this new set (with a few minor small hets
mixed in places across the dial), but if this is because of the
missing "Can", I could not tell you ?? So this is
indeed correct information !! At least something does not sound
right here...??
So who
knows what is going on here ?? A few speculations , I know that
there has been a service problem over the years in this area, as
the Die-cast case can put a bit of stress on Q47 and creates bad
solder joints at this IC. But why just take it out, it must have
to be around this DDS part of the circuit to keep noise down
right.... ?? Maybe it because that these little Die-Cast cases
were made by Eddystone in the UK (it's marked right on them),
well they went out of business eairler this summer ?? .
Hopefully AOR UK will throw a bit of logic on this in time, but
they may say that it was because of the "solder problems of
Q47" ? But a entire DDS/Synthesiser circuit not shelided....ahhhh
I don't think that is a good idea ????
"Missing Die Cast Case"*****************
From the user groups, incl my responce....
From: John Harding
Subject: [AR7030] Newer AOR7030's
"Hello Group,
I've had the opportunity to see a number of very recently shipped
AOR7030's and either the design has changed or they are just
missing it, but the larger (correction from John of an eariler
post made..davez)of the two shielded boxes on the pc board have
not been installed. If you have recently received a unit or have
ordered a unit, you might want to check into this. The holes are
still in the board as well as the silk-screening, but no
shielding box. The smaller box has been in place. (boxes are the
same design, just different sizes) Just another point, the
speaker leads also seem to now be directly soldered to the board.
No great loss, leads on speaker were too short to remove top
cover anyway."
DaveZ's comments:
Just FYI here. I have not had my new one open , but this could be
the reason that I notice a bit more background noise in this new
Plus that I just received a few weeks ago (side by side test
between a older standard unit) ? Those little "Die Cast"
covers that he makes reference to are (or "were" as
they are now no longer in business as of a few months ago) made
by Eddystone (marking on case proves this). (see the "real
audio" file link below for the actual test I did)
(See comment below) Mike of the UK to me personally about a IC in
the set no longer being made (since 1996) ..and no replacement ??
I actually hated those little spring clips that held the speaker
wires in , they always seemed to either not hold the speaker
wires very tight or fell out. So that could be a good thing.
DaveZ.
| Here is the test in
regards to the removed "can" being talked about
here that I did back in 1999. First recording is unit # 1
that was a newer "Plus" sample that is missing
the metal shieled can.The second half of this "Real
Audio" file is with a older Standard unit that still
has the "can". See if you can tell any
difference?? Same weak station, antenna, receiver setup....etc.
A very carefullly done equal test to be sure it was fair. Note: An additional "Real Audio" CODEC download may be required to play this file. AOR AR7030 test : No DDS shield "Plus" vs a "Standard" model with the shield (Real Audio File 139K) |
From:
Mathias Eisenkolb
A german SWL told me about the problem caused by the missing
shield of the DDS circuit which produces some heterodynes in his
set which I can not hear. In my receiver (serial no: 102039) the
box is in.I don't know why this has been left off. Too expensive
? Heard something about shipping-probs where the box caused a
damaged main-board caused by it's weight. 73 de Mathias
(DaveZ: Hummm, this is still in the older batch of sets (before
102050), this could be in other sets other than the current
production run ??....another intresting insight !!)
Another comment from Mike in the UK via the user group, including
a bit from yours truly. But it sure seems to be this way on the
"sample to sample" thing. I have not experenced the
lock up on the Demo version of Data Master that I have been using.
List and private email discussions suggest a common consensus
of variability in behaviour. Some sets it seems behave like mine,
others don't. Every '7030 appears to have it's own different
quirks.
Dave (davez) who has had five examples of the '7030, agrees:
"I'm really getting to think that every 7030 has it's own
different quirks (no two being the exactly the same). A real
shame, I have given up to trying to get at least close to a
perfect model."
"It's a lot like a new car I guess.. but I have never
experienced something like this in a radio (high sample to sample
variation) in my over 30 years playing with sets."
The reason I think that the -demo- of DataMaster might have
affected the firmware, is that despite scrupulously following the
setup instructions in the documentation, it crashed when
uploading memories, leaving the '7030 display showing weird
characters and the buttons and tuning control locked. I switched
the power feed off, disconnected the data lead and then switched
the power on again. All seemed OK except for changing mode and
filter simultaneously, where I noticed the loud clicks/pops which
I'd not been aware of beforehand.
Apart from the clicks/pops my '7030 seems otherwise to be working
OK. It just irks me that having paid a lot of money for a quality
radio, it has annoying bugs which I've not observed on much
cheaper radios.
Pity :
Best Wishes
Michael Slattery
Sheffield, UK
Intresting comment from Michael Slattery in the UK, he was
wondering if I haved checked inside my new one, I really do not
plan on ever opening it if I can help it. But a good question
here ??.
"On a different matter entirely, I wonder whether you've
looked inside your new '7030+. If you have, does it have a SL6440
IC as the second mixer? I ask since the SL6440 became obsolete
sometime back in 1996! I thought that maybe AOR would have to
abandon manufacture of the '7030 or do an extensive redesign
since AFAIK the SL6440 was only produced by Plessey and there is
no close equivalent. Perhaps AOR have vast stocks!"
A note from Richard in the UK, and using his 7030 outdoors. This
is a new finding.
"Having double-ended my long-wire aerial so that I can do
a bit of listening al-fresco, on a recent evening session I
turned on and it went berserk taking some time to power up, and
then full volume and display gone wild - power off at the mains
pronto - scratch head - bring indoors - try again al seemed well.
Was the problem the mains extension lead? So I took it outside
again - same problem - back indoors all OK - put it in a bag to
take on night shift with me and ponder the problem. When I turned
it on at work I found that all was well, but that all the
memories were corrupted - then the penny dropped. Heeding AOR's
advice about sunshine and the display I'd positioned it with it's
back to the setting sun which, at that time of evening is very
noisy in the infrared region and of course the 7030 has one of it's
IR detectors on the it's rear - problem solved, and now it goes
outside with 'Blutac' over this. The second is that in re-storing
all the memories and trying them I also discovered that, whilst
most information such as BW, PBS BFO Offset are stored AGC Speed
isn't which I find inconvenient and puzzling as to why AOR have
not included this."
Here is a posting from the AR7030 user/mailing list that might be
of intrest ?? I think this radio got zonked via the "Computer"
RS-232 cable in the storm. But is intresting how AOR USA
treated the set and the situation. I wish him luck..You have to
ship any AR7030 with that little thick "Cardboard" ring
around the tuning knob. If you do not, damage will more than
likely occur to the encoder !!!
I've had a 7030+ for almost a year and a half now. Like it
very well, run it off my computer with the AOR Data Master
software.
The other day I fired the unit up only to find the yellow-green
screen on with no graphics and no normal radio activity!!
Now the evening before we had a typical fifteen minute
thunderstorm, but I take all the precautions, the antenna was
removed from the AOR and the power supply, the only thing hooked
to the AOR was the rs232 (com 2) cable from the computer.
I packaged up the AOR and overnited it cross country to AOR in
California.Their report was that my AOR 7030+ was not repairable
and was scrap!!!
Cost to repair .....$1250.00
Well you could of knocked me over with a feather.......the
computer still working and operative, had a Com port problem
which was repaired for $145.00.
Damage and claim was reported to my insurance company who sent an
investigator out to talk and look see. He balked at the $1250.00
cost, said with no power supply and antenna on it and with the
low damage to the computer, AOR wasn't interested in repairing
the unit!! He offered $610.00 on a take it or leave it basis.
This was after the deductible, and two years of depreciation!!
I had sent the AOR to California in the original factory box but
when I received it back, the box was gone and replaced by a home-made
card-board carton, and wasn't packed at all!! The radio would
slide back and forth inside the box!!! Lord knows what additional
damage that caused.
I Emailed AOR in the UK who responded quickly asking to send the
radio back to them, saying that most all AOR were fixed within
one bench hour....
So with fingers crossed and baited breath, we await AOR UK's word...wish
me luck!!!
Bill reports on Sep 21 that AOR UK did indeed repair it...so
again don't count on AOR USA repairing your AR7030 !!
"...repaired it....a new display module, and a bunch of
miscellaneous related parts couple if IC's, caps and resistors, (if
it was suspect and in the near path..it was replaced) labor,
alignment etc...they even touched up some of the paint that had
flaked off due to shipping rubs by the above "service group"
on the underside, replaced a missing panel screw!!...looks like
new!! Works like a "Champ". Cost only $170.00!!!!"
"A happy ending to a nasty storm/lightning/surge incident
and what could have been the end of my AOR 7030+.
Thanks.Bill"
(UPDATE: AOR USA in CA, no longer does repair work on the AR7030)
Messgae from Nick KE2WG, as he too is feeling the AOR AR7030
blues. Can you say "Lack Of Quality Control" !!!
"I picked up a 7030 Plus, arrived yesterday. Serial #
10206x.Dead out of the box new. OUCH, this hurts. I checked the
wallwart supply. Found problem, it is dead. NO voltage output
what-so-ever."
He continues:
"What I think so far: For comparison, I have a Kenwood TS-870.
Quad conversion DSP at the IF level. Guess what, the 7030 hears
very weak SSB signals on 75 meters, that the 870 does not. Both
rigs were hooked to 300 FT long wire antennas, at 65 feet up. The
antennas run side by side, about 30 feet apart from each other.
Parallel would be the correct term here. I find the 7030 is a bit
quieter than the 870. However, the bandwidth flexability of the
870 is much better than the 7030. Also, the Auto Notch of the 870
is tops. So, this is my first impressions of the 7030 plus. I
intend to have the 7030 go head to head with my WJ and Racal
receivers."
* Nick informed me that the US dealer has repaired the power
supply. By the way the Power Supply that I received with my last
"Plus" unit..."Buzzes" fairly bad even at no
load..The older power supply that I received with my "Standard"
unit is just about totally quiet. So the transformer inside this
power supply is maybe in the same boat as the radio ??).
A few old notes that I found
as I was going over some old mail that I felt that were
worthy to post, one indicates the same "friction"
that I was having with my # 4 unit. Almost feels like a
chunk of felt jammed behind the knob. The #5 and # 6
samples has none of this feeling what-so-ever. Other is
with a power supply problem. EEB of course is no longer
with us (thank goodness). I cannot give you the dates
these were actually posted.
I'm the proud owner of a new '7030+, my first serious
receiver.Initial impressions are very good, especially of
the low noise floor and quality audio. Two gripes though:
My set suffers from the well known sync-detector-heterodynes
problem, did anyone manage to eliminate this by
realigning the sync or by bridging R109 with a 4k7 or 10k
as recommended by JT?
Secondly, the tuning control; mine has more resistance to
turning than I would have expected, in fact tuning the
set when it's switched off I can here what sounds like
the result of friction. Subjective I know but what does
your set tune like? Also the rate of slow-tuning is
faster than I was expecting, using thumb-in-dimple and
turning at about 1/2 rev per second I'm clocking up just
over 4KHz per rev in USB, 2-3 times what my cheapo DX-394
does. Maybe I'll get used to the faster tuning and even
find it to be a better tuning rate?
Nick Dawes
Michael Slattery wrote:
Q: 1. Using the 2.1kHz filter in SSB modes, PBS set to
zero, and no signal present, is the background noise the
same in both USB and LSB modes? Even after it has been
operating continuously for days my '7030's isn't. Running
the filter calibration routine doesn't seem to make any
difference!
A: For those having problems with distortion/noises when
the AR7030 is in AM Sync try changing your power supply.
When I received my AR7030 Plus last August the AM Sync
was totally unusable due to distortion and noise. In
addition when the receiver was turned off there was a low
level hum from the speaker which would gradually get
louder and after a couple of minutes it could be heard
all over the house. Sent E-mail to AOR and they suggested
the power supply might be the problem. When I fed the
receiver from another power supply all the problems
immediately cleared up. AOR promptly sent me a
replacement supply. Don't know if this will help anyone
but it is worth a try.
Al-K 4 G L U
Chincoteague Island, VA
Comment from Bill Winkis
Q: Just turned my AOR 7030+receiver on. It's tuned to
14.178- USB, and nothing...I can hear a little grabled
talking in the backround, but?? The "S" meter
works. Now switch over to AM -1270.0...and beautiful!! I've
been throught the menu's three time and can't see
anything out of line!! Is there a way to -reboot the
whole cpu and get back to full default?? Or what's in the
wrong position??
Bill Winkis
A: I have same problem when my receiver was 1 month old.
The problem was in preselector relay (MW_SW). After I
switch to/from MW/SW many times this problem go away.
Konstantin.
I do hope that at least part
of the information here has been of use ? Also a very big
"Thank You" to all who have e-mailed me with
any information.
Best Wishes, good luck...and as always.."Caveat
Emptor".
Dave N9EWO
Back to main
page
Also see : AOR AR7030 HF Tabletop Receiver User
Notes
page