WJ-8711(A) / HF-1000 (A)
User Notes
![]()
User notes from other
owners of these fine HF receivers.
Either sent direct to me or via newsgroups / mailing lists.
Latest entries will be entered at the top of this page.
A big "Thank You" to all. Dave N9EWO
Main Page : Watkins Johnson WJ-8711/HF-1000
DSP Receivers
Beware Of Old Versions |
| Earlier
versions of both of these sets had very serious problems
with audio quality (and limited number of bandwidths).
The audio was so harsh that it would make your eyes water.
This was cleared up in later productions. The changes
were not just with software. There were hardware changes
as well. I myself would avoid either radio with early
software / hardware (say a non "A" version or
before firmware 04.01.04 ?). What actual versions are
better than others (in-between the latest and the very
early ones), I cannot be of any help as I do not have any
solid information on this. Most of these very early
production samples cannot be upgraded anymore. This was
VERY expensive anyway and not worth it. Mind you the
early versions should still make a great "used"
WJ gem if the price was right. But I would avoid it as I'm
very picky on audio quality. See my main WJ8711/HF1000 page for
additional information. Dave N9EWO |
I will NOT be held responsible
for any info that is listed here |
Accessory Connector Source
Sent to me from an anonymous
contributor, a source for the rear accessory connector (at time
of writing). They do have a minimum order but is still going to
be at a much lower cost vs. going through DRS Signal Solutions.
(mfg of the connector : PRECISION CONNECTOR DESIGNS INC)
part number : ELFP13210
(put this part # in the search line on the web site below)
HEILIND ELECTRONICS INC
http://www.heilind.com/
Unused "Line Remote Gain" control information
The following came from the same
anonymous contributor as above. I have not tried this or plan to
myself, but perhaps a better way to tame the too "hot"
line output levels with the WJ8711/HF1000. I made a crude drawing
using the receivers schematic with the added trimmer to hopefully
show what he is talking about (as a general idea only). But the
usual warning for anyone attempting this you are "totally"
on your own and risk.
"If you look on page 4 of the "Digital" board
schematic, up in the right corner you will see the Line level
outputs. Just before the transformers you can see the Amplifier
IC's (NE5534). There is a 22K Ohm feedback resistor which sets
the output level. Attached to one side of this resistor is a 2.7K
Ohm resistor, the other side of the 22K resistor has a line going,
along with the output side of the 2.7K to J6 a 4 pin connector (not
installed)(Labeled REMOTE GAIN...Gee) which can be used as
a connector to add a vaiable resistor in parallel with the 22K
ohm resistor to reduce the gain of the IC and thus lower the Line
Level output. The holes for the connector are visible in your
"Unknown" picture of an HF-1000 (see
main page for the 8711).
Look just to the left , inboard, side of the output transformers
for the four open holes. I think the 2.7K is only in line to
prevent you from shorting out the Amplifiers. BE SURE THEY ARE IN
PLACE...of course if they are missing then you WILL have to add
them... If you start at about 50K- 75K you should be in the right
area. This should be a little cleaner than an external box."
![]()
Repair of a HF-1000
Power Supply
Rick Warnett from downunder has made a
successful repair on his Watkins Johnson HF1000's power supply.
The Condor SP1348(A) "Custom" power supply is used in
the WJ-8711 series receivers as well.
The part failure was a capacitor (C31) that shorted right near
the (U3) 7912 12 volt negative IC regulator. It's a 10 uf @ 63V
rating, electrolytic type.
Anyone who owns a WJ HF-1000 or WJ8711 series receiver already
knows a schematic of this Condor SP1348(A) power supply is
missing in the manual for these sets.
Thank You Rick for this most useful information.
Observation with
WJ-8711 "Technical Data Sheets".
Here is an observation
that I made while doing a bit of comparison between an older
"Pre-2003" technical data sheet vs. one dated
January 2003. Can you spot a difference?
Taken from a PRE 2003 "Data Sheet" for Speaker Output
Specs
Speaker Output
Number of Outputs
........................................................1
ISB mode: USB & LSB selected individually or combined.
(Internal speaker optional)
Bandwidth
......................................................................100
Hz to 13 kHz
Output Level
..................................................................Adjustable
up to 1 W into 8-ohm load
Total Harmonic Distortion
..............................................<3% at 1 W
Connector Type
.............................................................Screw
terminals
From a "Data Sheet" dated
Jan 2003 (Signia) (350K)
Speaker Output
Number of Outputs
.................................................... 1 output.
For ISB mode, select USB & LSB individually or combined.
(Internal speaker optional)
Bandwidth
..................................................................
100 Hz to 13 kHz
Output Level
..............................................................
Adjustable up to 500 mW into 8-ohm load
Total Harmonic Distortion
.......................................... <3% at 1 W
Connector Type
......................................................... Screw
terminals
OK, can you tell a difference between these two? I sure do. The
PRE 2003 data sheet showing the SPEAKER output level as up to 1 W
and the JAN 2003 one giving an output of only 500 mW.
I do know for a fact that the 1.5 watt LM388 audio amplifier IC
has been discontinued for a very long while now, and I'm
wondering if they ran out and finally had to substitute a
different "audio amp" IC?
NOTE: This is for "FYI" only! Let me
say here that I have no solid information on this and may mean
nothing at all. However it does suggest that the audio is not as
high now having a specification of only 500 mW for output? Folks
that's 50% decrease in specification here vs the eariler
data sheet.
My sample was purchased just before (just weeks before 2003), and
still has the 1.5 Watt LM388 IC.
Specs on LM388 audio amp IC (180k)
Dave Z. N9EWO
" Hammond
Cabinet Info. " (May
2004)
I have been asked a number
of times now for information to the "Hammond" cabinet
that I have my WJ-8711A in (top of this page). That's a good
question too as they make many. Better order a pack of the "rack"
mounting screws too as the cabinet does not include any (however
it does come with the "speed nut clips") . Here are the
details. Additional info can be found on the "Hammond Mfg." web site.
"Hammond" Cabinet
Model Number is : RCBS1900517BK1
"Hammond" Package of 4
Mounting Screws and Cup Washers (Cup Washers are Black Plastic) :
1421A
I have found 3 USA
dealers where to purchase Hammond products (elsewhere I cannot be
of any help, sorry) ?? Mouser and Digikey appears to drop ship, that is they do not
have them in stock. Newark is the place where I purchased mine from
and usually has them ready to ship (at least at the time I wrote
this text). But the price is a bit higher from Newark. Again I
found the the prices to vary quite a bit, somewhere in the $ 120.
to 150. USD area for the cabinet.
Dave Z. N9EWO
Comments from Others
WJ-8711A Dallas Lankford , rev. 1, 4/21/04
My new WJ-8711A just arrived. I havent done much more than
unpack it and turn it on. Microprocessor (uP) noise at the higher
SW frequencies, but nice and quiet in the MW band. I noticed that
the preamp is automatically deactivated below 500 kHz.
Just finished measuring
the AM sensitivity at 1.6 MHz (usual parameters). 1.0 uV with the
preamp on and 1.3 uV with the preamp off. They may as well have
left the preamp out. Of course, a little thing like that
Do I like the WJ-8711A? You bet. It has the best frequency
display I have seen. And the other LED displays are excellent too.
The tuning knob is identical to the Racal RA6778C knob, but
finished differently (black abodized or powder coated). It has a
nice heavy feel to it, and an attached dimple (quite large) for
spinning with your finger. The 8711A seems very intuitive and
easy to use. The frequency entry, step change, and other features
are simply the best of any receiver I have used. I suppose you
can customize the BWs for each mode, but I probably
wont bother because it is so easy to select a BW different
from the factory default with the push button selected rotary
knob (which, with other push buttons, is also used to select mode,
AGC release time, noise blanker setting, and so on).
It appears to have 100 memories, but I havent used that
feature yet. There are separate audio level knobs for the
headphones and speaker. Very nice. The manual specifies 2 Vrms
into 8 ohms (1/2 watt) for the speaker output, but I measured 3.5
Vrms (1.5 watts into 8 ohms), and an audio BW of at least 100 Hz
to 13,000 Hz at less than 3% harmonic distortion. Connected to a
good speaker, it sounds excellent to me. Headphone output through
a ¼ inch stereo headphone jack (stereo for ISB, L and R common
in all other modes) is specified as 10 mW (presumably rms) into
600 ohms, no BW given. Low impedanced headphones seem to work
fine.
Pressing the special function key repeatedly toggles you through
various user selectable parameters. In particular, it allows you
to choose the release (decay) times for fast, medium, and slow
AGC. You dont have complete freedom to choose, but 10
100 mS for fast, 100 to 1000 mS for medium, and 1 5
S for slow. I reset mine to 100, 1000, and 3. I havent had
any hets yet, but the (presumably manual) notch filter is there
if you need it. And yes, there is AM synchronous detection if you
want it. It is the only feature of the 8711A that is not well
implemented. A good AMSD should be transparent to the user, i.e.,
never lose lock, and lock instantly to the strongest carrier in
the passband. The AMSD of the 8711A does not meet these
requirements. However, since most people cant tell the
difference between a good slow AGC release time and a good AMSD,
it doesnt really matter. The 3 second release time I chose
for my slow release takes care of strongly fading SW and MW
graveyarders. And in the rare event that it wont, the 8711A
manual gain control is excellent for those occasions.
Tuning around in CW mode with no antenna connected, I did not
find any internally generated spurs from 150 kHz to 10 MHz where
I got tired of spinning the knob. I did find one at 125 kHz or
thereabouts. This WJ-8711A is the most spur-free receiver I have
ever tested, bar none. I wish I could say the same about the
LOs, or perhaps it is the DSP circuits. I dont really
know. But tuning around near a carrier produces all sorts of weak
birdies. Most of these are within about +/- 20 kHz of the carrier.
But there were additional (presumably 1st LO) spurs at
about +32.5, +72.5,
and -47.5, -87.5,
kHz from the
carrier, decreasing slowly in level. These correspond to phase
noise of about -127 dBc/Hz when using a 6 kHz BW. So they are not
really a serious issue, though I would like to see better LO
performance in a receiver of this caliber. It is possible that
they are spurs of the internal frequency standard. Ill
check this later. I have been running the 8711A head to head
against one of my R-390As on some weak signals, and it is a
dead heat. I am very pleased with it.
Via the Premium Receiver List :
For weak signal reception, the 340 often keeps
up with the WJ8712p/WJ8711a/HF1000a, but never exceeds (the WJ
circuits do a better job with weak circuits). Both TT and WJ weak
signal improved with use of SE-3.
The Ten Tec RX-340 does a poor job compared to WJ on trans-pacific
mw dxing where the AM stations are on 9khz spacing while US on 10
(which means that you often have a weak TP station just 1, 2 or 3
kHz from a strong USA station, even with phasing). The skirts on
the DSP filters of the Ten Tec just don't hold up well in this
situation.
SAM on Ten Tec does not work well -- I don't use it.
Instead you'll see that I use a SE-3 (and also for the WJ).
Don AC7ZG
PS: The WJ8712p's, WJ8711a's and HF-1000a's are far superior to
the other premium receivers I own. Each has its own SE-3, DSP599zx,
and Sony E10.
My icom7800 does not hold a candle to the WJ8712p/WJ8711a/HF1000a
for TP medium wave dxing, nor weak signal recovery on the
shortwave bands.
Like the ICOM756pro2 and 3, the 7800 has an attenuator in
circuit below 1700kHz to prevent overload by AM stations. Guy
Atkins has made some circuit changes to his pro3 to bring it into
play as a weak signal MW receiver, including removing the
attenuation circuit and replacing the roofing filter with one of
the 6kHz versions from the 7800. (I've not similarly butchered my
IC-7800)
Don AC7ZG
PS: I've used one of my WJ8711A's for receive (disabled
during transmit) along with the IC-7800 to do
some very weak signal ham radio qsos -- the 7800 could not
keep up.
I have had my WJ HF-1000A for many
years and for the last few years used it with a Sherwood SE-3
synchronous detector. It has been my top receiver, and I have
tried many other high-end receivers that have not been able to
match it. Then - enter the RA6790/GM .
But first a few word of what "DX" means for me.
a) I am only DX-ing mediumwave, so all my experience with these
receivers are based on frequencies below 1700 kHz - no exception
;-)
b) I only target overseas radio stations, primarily North America,
Far East and Pacific.
It useful to know that I am located in a "quiet"
location - approx 63 degrees north, 10 degrees east, with good
"protection" (mountains) to the south. There are no
local AM stations, and the strongest AM-signal on the S-meter
would be S9+50 dB. I often go on DX-peditions to even more quiet
locations. This means that receiver sensitivity is very important,
maybe the most important property of the receiver.
Last fall I got a RA6790/GM "in transit" and tested it
for a while. It's not the world's most user-friendly receiver,
but I was impressed by the ability of the receiver to pick up
signals and make them legible. I would say that it matched the HF1000A
in most situations where there was little or no interference from
nearby channels. This unit was equipped with the standard Racal
filters. I used the receiver mostly with the SE-3.
I now have a RA6790/GM with (the hard-to-get) preamplifier + Rob
Sherwood's filters and it's dedicated SE-3. This unit was in
excellent condition and had been serviced by Gary Wingerd. This
one works even better, and I find it as an excellent second
receiver. Second because it's not very fast to work with when
checking frequencies for carriers etc. like I often do when
looking for DX. It's still not as good as the HF-1000A on weak
signals close to European stations - this probably both due to
the filters and the missing
notch.
To me the biggest disadvantage with the RS6790/GM is the missing
notch. When using the SE-3 I get 1/2/3/4 kHz tones (dependent on
the filter width) when I am too close to European stations. On
the HF-1000A and a few other receivers I have, there is an IF-notch
that actually nulls the carrier of the interfering stations. This
is much more effective than the audio notch. I do of course use
an audio notch on the RA6790/GM now, but I believe this could be
better if I had an IF-notch (with have tried with and without on
the HF-1000A and there is significant difference).
So compared with the HF-1000A I will say it's the closest I have
tried so far. Regarding the RX-340 I have not worked a lot with
it, but from what I have seen I am not impressed by its
performance. It's very user-friendly (like the HF-1000A) but it
does not fit my needs very well. I'd rather have a (or two) RA6790/GM
than the RX-340.
73 de OJS
Trondheim, Norway
I have the 8712P - I use them
extensively, along with 8711A and HF1000A variants, dxing MW and
SW on the WCNA. I don't have the 8712A's so cannot comment
on these directly.
8712P are electrically identical with the WJ8711, but physically
2/3 the height (2U) and 1/2 the width of the WJ8711A( but just a
little deeper). The price point is a big higher than a standard
8711A, but not by much. I have yet to see one on Ebay.
You might see an occasional 8712A variant on ebay as a bunch of
8712A boards were let go to the employees at reduced cost due to
a QA mistake - - the boards were overcooked in the QA ovens
during reliability tests - nothing major, the buyer didn't want
them. These are invariably the older rev of the board that
won't permit the upgrade to the most recent 4.1.10 microcode.
(They are the older 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 microcode, and older
motherboard).
Orders new from BAE Systems (now DRS...dave) take about
4-6 months. Almost all the features of the WJ8711A are available
-- excepting the change in the roofing filter to 8kHz (I've never
noted any difference in adjacent channel dxing between the 16 and
8kHz roofing filters, but there are those that feel this does
make a difference).
Regards
Don
One of the bets tips I can pass
along regarding the WJ HF-1000 (and most every receiver with an
adjustable RF gain control) is to learn to use this control to
optimise the recovered audio. With the 1000, you can select AGC
Threshold mode (described in the manual); in this mode, the RF
Gain control will set the AGC threshold when any of the AGC modes
are selected. Using the RF Gain control in this mode is a real
plus...by backing off the RF Gain to the point that the AGC stops
pumping (especially in Synch AM mode), nearly all effects of
fading and the like can be either eliminated or greatly minimised.
Due to the position in the circuit where the S Meter signal is
derived (it is more an RF signal strength meter than an S-meter
as most other receivers do it), the use of the RF Gain control
will not be seen on the meter. On receivers where the S Meter
signal is derived from the AGC line, you will see the meter
reading rise when the RF Gain is reduced; when the meter has
stopped fluctuating with fading (i.e., it is higher than with
full RF gain but is stable), you've hit the optimum setting. Just
sit back and enjoy consistent audio level.
This method of using the RF Gain control has the added benefit (usually)
of reducing distortion in the recovered audion due to possible
overloading of the detector.
I have the HF-1000 with the terminal strip (according to WJ, with
whom I have chatted on a number of occasions, the latest version),
and I can tell you that the audio that comes out the speaker
channel (on the back of the rx) is *loaded* with digital hash. On
the other hand, the audio coming out of the phones channel (on
the front panel) is absolutely clean. So, I use the phones output,
either to a sensitive speaker or to the input of an amp, and
forget about the speaker channel.
(Speaker output is indeed awash with digital hash, but either
rear line output is totally clean. I still found then left "tip"
headphone output to contain hash and excessive digital hiss , and
was a "last version" sample of the HF1000A as well...DaveZ)
Walt Novinger
The preselector is a tradeoff --
if you are in a strong signal environment (Europe) you'll
probably wish you had this. If you use it you will trade a few dB
of sensitivity, so unless you are near a strong transmitter
elsewhere in the world you won't need it. Installing it is easy.
Bypassing is easy --- it gets fed by the antenna via BNC. An
output BNC-coax-BNC jumpers it to the normal receiver antenna
input. Bypass by switching the antenna to this port).
Don Moman
(DaveZ note: The manual
states, the optional suboctave preselector will degrade
sensitivity/noise figures between 1.5 to 2.5 db, depending on
frequency. The test report that came with my set (tested for the
actual sample) indicated the insertion loss at 1.2 db at 15 Mhz
and this appears to be correct. So a tad of loss with it in line
and if you need every bit of sensitivity for a weak signal as
stated above by Don it can be bypassed.)
DECEMBER 01,1999
I just got off the phone with W-J Helpline (customer rep David
Shane) and learned about HF-1000's future.
1. Production and Support:
W-J is accepting orders on the HF-1000 only to 12/31/99.
Production will continue on the mil version (8711A) for the
foreseeable future, even after the division ownership transfers
to Marconi early in the year. Continued support of the HF-1000A
is promised, since it and the 8711A are nearly identical.
Production of the HF-1000 is being discontinued because sales
have dropped to about 20/year, making it difficult to justify the
expense of marketing two nearly identical products. W-J believes
that people who don't already have an HF-1000 will be willing to
pay an extra $1000 for the 8711A, or will find an HF-1000 on the
used market.
There are no plans to implement the Speech Enhancement Unit (SEU)
for the HF-1000, given the availability of excellent aftermarket
DSP noise and autonotch filters. Similarly, no remote PC software
enhancements are planned, since excellent aftermarket software is
available.
2. Differences between the HF-1000 and 8711A:
The two radios are fabricated on the same assembly line using
identical circuit boards. There are minor firmware changes. The
bezels are different and the cabinet is painted (HF-1000) rather
than anodized.
(Update: On a late 2000 version of the WJ-8711A, the front panel
is painted and not anodized !!...DaveZ)
3. Firmware Upgrades for the HF-1000:
The latest controller firmware is v.04.01.10. A replacement chip
costs about $130 and requires that the HF-1000 have a controller
board labelled 797214 (etched on the board and listed in the
manual). The earlier board is part 797012, and the latest
firmware it can accept is v.04.01.03 (requires a 33 MHz or faster
DSP chip). Upgrading controller boards costs about $2000 (!)
Fortunately for those of us with the older board, there are
extremely minor operational differences between firmware versions
04.01.03 and 04.01.10. Most of the changes were made for
manufacturing reasons (to simplify factory alignment, etc.)
rather than to enhance performance. The two operational features
are minor bug fixes, one associated with receiver muting, and the
other with a remote control command that, when issued repeatedly,
can cause lockup. Unless one has specifically encountered these
bugs in an application (which rarely happens), W-J doesn't
recommend shelling out the $130 for the upgrade chip, even if you
have the later control board.
Jim Garland W8ZR
| Firmware Upgrade UPDATE (SEP 2003) : Reported via an email sent to me direct (note: this info was not direct from DRS), It appears that DRS is no longer offering "older" upgrade EEPROMS. Say if one wishes to go from an older firmware version 04.00.01 to update to 04.01.03, forget it. So now the only way you would be able to do that on a early sample is to change out the entire controller/DSP board, and the price has risen close to $ 3000.00 (!) to do it. No more firmware support on the older versions ? Dave Z. |
DRS Technologies - Signia IDT - BAE Systems - Watkins Johnson WJ-8711/HF-1000 DSP Receivers